M13 (NGC6205)Globular Cluster |
||
|---|---|---|
| Constellation | Hercules | |
| Right ascension | 16h 39.9m | |
| Declination | +36° 33' | |
| Distance | 25.000 l.y. | |
| Visual mag. | 5.7 | |
| Ø (') | 23 | |
| Picture made
from Giorgio Puglia and Carmelo Zannelli with the O.R.S.A.'s Newton Ø 412 mm. f/4.3. |
||
![]()
![]()
Edmond Halley discovered M13 in 1714; the first
description of this object appears in his Memoir of 1715, "Of Nebulae or Lucid
Spots among the fixt Stars", that was the first list to be compiled which
consisted of nebulae alone as distinguished from nebulous object included in star
catalogues. Halley describes M13 as "...a little Patch, but it shews it self to
the naked Eye, when the Sky is serene and the Moon absent.".
Messier, in 1764, described it as "A nebula which
I am sure contains no star. Round and brilliant; centre brighter than the edges...reported
in the English Celestial Atlas".
William Herschel, with his great reflector,
resolved M13 into "a most beautiful cluster of stars exceedingly compressed in the
middle and very rich."
M13 lies about one-third the distance from h to z Herculis. Exploring this region with a pair of binoculars, you have no difficulty in locating the object: under a clear, very dark sky, it may be een with the naked eye, as a little cloudy star of the 6th magnitude.
Small telescopes show M13 as a bright rond nebula about 10' in diameter; the size is more than doubled in the long exposure photographic plates. A 100-150 mm. telescope begins to resolve into hundreds of small stars, and in a 300 mm. the globular is an unforgettable sight.
The photograph of M13 give an impression of an incredibly density of this cluster, and
suggest that the stars are virtually in contact. But this is an illusion, due to the great
distance and the merging of the numberless star images. In fact, the central region of the
globular covers an area about 100 light years across, i. e. a million cubic light years in
volume; if a million stars populate this space, the density is no greater than about one
star per cubic light year.
In his "Celestial Handbook", Burnham explains this fact with an
interesting example: he construct an imaginary scale model of the cluster, where the stars
are represented by a million grains of sand, distributed throughout a spherical volume
same 300 miles in diameter. Each grain would be 0.03 inch in size, and separated from the
next nearest grain by a distance...of three miles!
The distance of M13 has been extimated as about 25.000 a.l., so its angular size of 23'
corresponds to about 100 l. y. The age is calculated as 14 billion years.
Herschel estimated that M13 contained some
14,000 stars. According to Burnham, when he writed his "Celestial Handbook",
more than 30,000 stars were counted, down the 21st magnitude, in a survey at Mt. Wilson.
Obiously, it's impossible to count the stars in the rich central core: in this region, the
innumerable star images merge into a great glowing mass; but it seems certain that the
total population exceeds a million stars.
According to Kenneth Glyn Jones, M13, like M3, contains a young, blue star of spectral
type B2: its membership of the cluster has been confirmed by radial velocity measurements.
In consideration of the age of the globular cluster, this fact seems inexplicable:
probably, the gravitational field of M13 accidentally captured the star.
M13 contains only a few variable stars, 15 according Kenneth Glyn Jones; other globulars,
i. e. M3 or M15, contain more than a hundred of them. The reason for this difference is
not clear.
![]()
| If you have any suggestions,
or find any errors, please e-mail me. Any constructive feedback is highly appreciated! |
||
|---|---|---|